Microsoft Windows 10 Anniversary Update 1607 Download (Build 14393.0) – Available Editions Windows 10 Anniversary Update 1607 (AU) (Build 14393.0) images contain multiple edition on one install disc. Each edition provides a different featurepack.
Oct 24, 2017 - macOS High Sierra vs Windows 10 comparison. Another addition in the Fall update is the ability to share with one click - when you right click.
Down below you’ll find a comparisn of the different Windows 10 Anniversary Update (AU) 1607 ISO download packages available on this site. All links point directly onto Microsoft official download servers and are valid for 24 hours. These links get reset each day. The source-url of each download will be ““. Rest assured that you check the MD5/SHA1 sums after each download even though the Windows 10 Anniversary Update ISO download points directly to Microsoft. A complete feature comparison of all Windows 10 1607 Anniversary Update editions can be found on Wikipedia.
Microsoft Windows 10 1607 Anniversary Update (AU) Download (Build 14393.0) – Standard This is Standard-Edition. This version contains all updates released within Windows 10 “Anniversary Update”. Images contain two versions, Windows 10 Anniversary Update Home and Windows 10 Anniversary Update Pro. Once the installation begins, you’ll be able to activate this version with either your current Windows 7 Key or a Windows 10 Key. The install routine then takes a couple of seconds to verify your valid product key and begin the installation for which the key was made for. Microsoft Windows 10 1607 Anniversary Update (AU) Download (Build 14393.0) – N-Edition This is N-Edition. This version contains all updates released within Windows 10 N “Anniversary Update”. Additional to the standard Windows 10 Anniversary Update edition Microsoft specially destined a so called ‘ N-Edition‘ for the European market as well as Switzerland.
The N-Edition does not come with pre-installed media-related technologies like or Camera. Images contain both, Windows 10 Anniversary Update Home and Windows 10 Anniversary Update Pro. Microsoft Windows 10 1607 Anniversary Update (AU) Download (Build 14393.0) – KN-Edition Besides the ‘ N-Edition‘ for the EU and Switzerland Microsoft released a ‘ KN-Edition‘ for the South Korean market. Like the edition for the EU and Switzerland, the KN-Edition does not come with pre-installed media-related technologies like or Camera. This version does contain all updates released within Windows 10 “Anniversary Update” KN. Images contain both, Windows 10 Anniversary Update Home and Windows 10 Anniversary Update Pro. Microsoft Windows 10 1607 Anniversary Update (AU) Download (Build 14393.0) – Single-Language-Edition This version consists, as the title states, only of one single language available for the Microsoft Windows 10 Anniversary Update.
You are not eligable to install another language for your OS. But we also offer these images here! Images contain both, Windows 10 Anniversary Update Home and Windows 10 Anniversary Update Pro. Although it is not supported by default, there is a chance to get another language installed anyway. We describe they process if you follow this tutorial.
Overall, Safari on OS X took a persuasive lead. On our iMac, across all benchmarks, Safari proved 67% faster on average than Internet Explorer on Windows. On the MacBook Air, Safari was around twice as fast overall. We saw one glaring anomaly: Microsoft’s browser pulled far ahead of Safari in the SunSpider test.
But we suggest you don’t attach too much significance to this: when you consider IE’s laggardly scores in the other benchmarks, it looks very much as though the browser has been optimised for this benchmark. We expect real-world performance will be closer to what we’ve seen in the Kraken and Octane tests. Clearly, if you’re planning to stick to the OS developer’s own browser, Safari on OS X is the way to go – but it’s worth remembering that these native browsers aren’t your only options. One popular alternative is Google Chrome, which is offered for both OS X and Windows. When we repeated our tests using the latest build of Google Chrome (version 29) on both systems, we saw OS X’s apparent advantage completely erased. In fact, Apple’s platform was left slightly behind overall – the iMac trailed across our tests by an average of 8%, the MacBook Air by around 1%. This is probably a small enough margin to live with, but the upshot is clear: when it comes to online performance, your choice of OS makes much less difference than your choice of browser.
Test 2: Office applications For our next set of tests, we turned to two of the most widely used applications in the world – Word and Excel. Microsoft publishes OS X editions of these programs as part of the Office for Mac suite, but they have different interfaces, and while Windows users are on Office 2013, the latest Mac suite is the 2011 edition. This being the case, we expected to see some palpable differences in the user experience across the two platforms. Basic tasks such as typing, printing, opening files and calculating sums happened so smoothly in both operating systems that we couldn’t detect any difference.
But larger tasks, such as big find-and-replace jobs and drawing graphs, make differing levels of performance noticeable. We started by opening a large document in Word – the full text of Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, to be precise – and timed how long it took the software to replace every letter “I” with the word “TEST”. This isn’t exactly a real-world exercise, but it’s an indicator of overall performance. Next, we pumped up the font size to 32 points and timed how long it took for Word to repaginate the document. In Word 2013 on Windows, this stretched it from 43 pages to 587 pages, while in Word for Mac 2011, owing to differences in the default formatting, the document ran to 683 pages. Our results, in seconds, can be seen in the graph below. Clearly, Word for OS X is slower than Word for Windows.
On the MacBook Air, the difference wasn’t too alarming – as a proportion, eight seconds is much longer than five seconds, but our test was deliberately extreme, and for real-world find-and-replace tasks, the difference is likely to be negligible. On the iMac, however, Word 2011 for Mac lagged by a greater margin, especially in the repagination task. As with our browser test, Word isn’t your only choice. If you’re using a Mac for work, you might prefer to use a Microsoft-branded office suite. But for many Mac users, Apple’s own iWork suite – comprising Pages, Numbers and Keynote – provides sufficient power.
It’s cheaper, too, coming free with a new Mac or costing £42 on older hardware, while Microsoft’s Office for Mac Home & Student edition comes in at £110. A more appropriate comparison might therefore be Word 2013 versus Pages 9.3. The results of that test are shown in our next graph. As you can see, the situation is flipped: Microsoft Word is quicker on Windows than on a Mac, but Pages on OS X delivers the best performance on any platform. We also compared performance in Excel. Again, we started by testing the latest versions, pitting Excel 2013 on Windows against Excel 2011 on OS X.
This time, the test was to render a stacked 3D bar graph representing four series of 1,000 random numbers. Here, we saw no effective difference between versions, so we moved on to compare Excel on Windows with Apple’s Numbers on OS X. Since Numbers’ charting options don’t precisely match those of Excel, our approach doesn’t allow a perfect comparison of performance.